The Guys of LIDAR got together to do some miscellaneous testing of several radar detectors, many which were brand new right out of the box.
All else being equal, how to the radar detectors stack up against each other in terms of performance? This is what we set out to determine. We tested the detectors by exposing each one to a specific set of controlled conditions.
For the Straight-Line sensitivity test, we used radar absorbent foam (this was not used for the other tests).
Eccosorb is specially-designed foam which absorbs radar. In this test, the Guys of LIDAR used layers of Eccosorb in front of the radar antennas to reduce the radar signal, or make it weaker.
Why? Because a detector's job is to sniff out weak signals.
The further away you are from the radar, the weaker the signal becomes. Today's high-end radar detectors can detect radar miles and miles away in the right situations. Because of this, radar detector tests commonly use hills, terrain, or other means to reduce the radar signal for test purposes. But every test situation is different, and these methods can sometimes yield sporadic results.
Enter Eccosorb. The Eccosorb allowed us to reduce the radar signal in a highly-controlled manner, and allowed us to test on a straight course under highly controlled conditions. This method of testing also reduced or eliminated some of the unpredictability that occurs with other methods, and yielded highly-repeatable results.
In addition to the Eccosorb in front of the radar, the sides and rear were also surrounded with Eccosorb just for good measure to help prevent any stray radar reflections.
Please remember: what these test results provide is an indication of "relative sensitivity", or how the detectors might compare against themselves or each other. Just like any other radar detector test (foam or not), the absolute distances in the results cannot be applied to any situation other than the specific test conditions.
In this test, just like any other, it's the ratios that matter.
If you follow our tests, then this test course needs no introduction. It's a 2000+ foot straight-stretch at the end of a deserted dead-end road. For this test, we tested each detector thoroughly on all the of the main Ka frequencies, and also experimented a bit to see how different detector settings might affect performance. The test vehicle proceeded down the test course and stopped at the first alert from the detector under test. The distance back to the radar vehicle was measured by using an LTI Ultralyte in survey mode.
We did some experimenting with how the different settings on the detectors might change the way the detectors perform. There are always a lot of questions regarding this. For these tests, we used the Kustom Golden Eagle @ 35.5 GHz Ka band.
One other thing to note: we found that the SmartCord worked on all of the BEL Vector series detectors.
This test was performed on a 90-degree curve, with the radar aimed into the curve from one direction, and the test vehicle travelling into the curve from the other direction. Results are expressed as the distance from the test vehicle to the apex of the curve. K-Band and 34.7 GHz Ka band were tested.
For this test, the radar unit we used was a Kustom Eagle @ 35.5 GHz Ka-Band. The target vehicle with the detectors was positioned at a stationary point approximately 1 mile away from the radar vehicle, with some terrain in between. Each detector was hit three times with instant-on bursts lasting approximately 2 second each. The results indicate whether each detector alerted or not.